🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute small “playful character”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but very loyal companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a kind nature.

Thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian amusement park have been entangled in a tussle between a closed attraction, local and national governments and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the intense discussion over their future often overlooks the complexities of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been carefully observed by the people who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities disallowed the export of the belugas to China, the embattled attraction near Niagara Falls where they are housed threatened to end their lives unless the government pays for the expense of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has refused that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and communal behavior indicate they are highly cognitive animals – something a former trainer observed directly.

Burgess spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a role that entailed earning the trust of the marine predators.

“Establishing those bonds over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of care. At the beginning, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so wonderful and gratifying.”

Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so amazed by the subtleties and quirks in their personalities. She cultivated a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with different natures.

“Eve selected me. The other required effort,” she said. “Both changed the way I view relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s interaction with the whales developed against a background of increasing societal concern to their confinement.

During her time at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, died. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a toll which the park links to expected lifespan, but which campaigners say indicates the poor conditions in which they were kept.

The facility did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes results of the shutdown. “Structural materials is falling apart from the pools because they’re degrading and not being maintained. The whales are inquisitive and so they take pieces and swim around with chunks in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”

The facility did not reply to a inquiry, but earlier stated: “The whales … obtain far superior veterinary services and around the clock supervision than any individual in the Britain, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was dismissed from the park in early March following the demise of Eos, an unwell beluga the employees had to euthanize. She said the facility believed information of the incident were leaked to the media and she was let go soon after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left her and current and former trainers in distress. She says the park’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “extremely difficult” task, adding any efforts to euthanize even a individual beluga would require “significant manpower”, vehicles and machinery.

“There’s no way in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

She backs calls for the whales to be transferred immediately from the park, with its deteriorating pools and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister rejected a request to transfer the whales to China.

“To approve the application would have meant a perpetual existence in enclosure and a reversion to public entertainment,” the minister stated. “As society, we know that whales should be in the sea, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing permit an export that would prolong the situation these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s comments indicate a wider misunderstanding of the realities of existence for belugas raised in confinement.

“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have lived entirely in captivity and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t realize that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As authorities struggle to find a resolution, proposals have been put forward, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a important part of nourishment for local populations.

A suggested sanctuary in the province of Nova Scotia, which recently received regulatory clearance, has been contentious. The prospective facility, which includes 100 acres of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Advocates remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a sustainable solution for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s consulted, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Different voices say the prospect of a sanctuary indicates a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible plan in the short term.

An official, head of the plan, said the location will replicate the intellectual stimulation and feeding regimen the whales get from caretakers, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|